Keep Your Sanity Mac OS

broken image


With every Mac sold comes a powerful little app called Automator. By using a drag-and-drop user interface, this under-appreciated software allows anyone to quickly automate monotonous tasks, and get work done in a snap. Today, I want to show off some of my favorite Automator workflows that highlight exactly how powerful this tool is.

  1. Keep Your Sanity Mac Os 11
  2. Keep Your Sanity Mac Os Download

Make sure that your Mac has a connection to the internet. Then turn on your Mac and immediately press and hold Command (⌘)-R until you see an Apple logo or other image. If you're asked to select a user you know the password for, select the user, click Next, then enter their administrator password. If you're running Windows 8, your OS will still get updates and patches until Jan. 10, 2023—but the Windows lifecycle fact sheet is a good reference to keep at hand. It will tell you if your. Firstly, go to the main menu by clicking on the Apple icon and choose to restart your system. While the system is restarting, press the Command and R keys at the same time till your Mac enters the Recovery mode. When you get the utility window on the screen, just click on the 'Reinstall macOS' option and continue the process.

Download CleanMyMacX: More about CleanMyMacX: are 20 hidden Mac OS features that will help maximise ho. How to Force Empty Trash on Your Mac Using Terminal. The Terminal application in Mac OS X can.

Keep in mind, creating a new workflow is a lot like solving a puzzle, so the process is actually fun for some of us. And since you can easily weave in more complexity as your skills progress, Automator is actually a fantastic introduction to the logic and structure that makes full-fledged programming possible. If that sounds appealing, let's jump in, and explore five ways Automator can make your life a little bit easier.

Rotating images

One of the most frustrating parts of digital photography is actually managing your photos. And if you're using a camera without a gyroscope, you might end up with hundreds of photos that are oriented in the wrong direction. You could certainly go through them all and manually rotate them, but this process is actually incredibly easy to automate.

Start by adding the 'Ask for Finder Items' action, and tick the 'Allow Multiple Selections' checkbox. If you want to leave the original versions untouched, you can add the 'Copy Finder items' action. Now, add the 'Rotate Images' action to the end. Choose which direction you want to rotate, and then save the workflow. If you're not consistent in which direction you rotate your camera, you may want to save two versions — one for left rotations, and one for right.

Bulk file renaming

If you're dealing with files from multiple different sources, the filenames are bound to be completely incomprehensible. Normally, that's not a big deal, but some programs require any input to be named meticulously. Specifically, I run into this issue when I'm running DNA results through certain third-party tools. Instead of manually going through all of the files and renaming them, let your Mac do the heavy lifting for you.

Add the 'Ask for Finder Items' action, toggle on the 'Allow Multiple Selections' checkbox, and decide if you want to make copies or simply rename the original files. If you want to make copies, add the 'Copy Finder Items' action as well. Now, add the 'Rename Finder Items' action to the end, and use the configuration menu to customize the naming scheme as you see fit. I tend to use 'Make Sequential,' but your needs may vary.

Text-to-speech

OS X‘s built-in text-to-speech engine is incredibly useful for various tasks, and Automator allows you to quickly generate audio from a text source, and save that out to your disk as an AIFF file. Whether you need a voice sample for your next dubstep track or you're simply interested in hearing essays read to you while you're driving, this method is extremely easy to implement.

Rewinder (nolan) mac os. While there are numerous ways to get text into this workflow, I've found the easiest way is to paste your text into a TextEdit window, and then add the 'Get Contents of TextEdit Document' action. From there, add the 'Text to Audio File' action, pick which voice you want to use, and give the file a name.

Panic button

If you're living or working around other people, you'll probably need to leave your Mac unattended eventually. As someone who's had to deal with countless mischievous friends and co-workers, your best bet is to lock down your system whenever you're not in front of it. And if you're worried about inadvertently disturbing others while you're away, it's probably wise to close all of your apps, and mute your system as well. Thankfully, you can simplify this entire process down to a single click.

Start off with the 'Quit All Applications' action. If you don't want to deal with additional prompts, make sure you turn off the 'Ask to save changes' checkbox. However, this has the potential to lose unsaved data, so be very careful. Next, add the 'Set Computer Volume' action, and turn down 'Output volume' and 'Alert volume' to prevent your Mac from making noises. Finally, add the 'Start Screen Saver' action. And provided that you've configured your Mac to require a password immediately upon sleep or initiation of the screen saver (System Preferences > Security & Privacy > General), your Mac will be locked with a single click.

Run scripts

Keep your sanity mac os x

Without a doubt, the most powerful aspect of Automator is the ability to run AppleScript, JavaScript, and shell scripts in the workflow. The scripts can be as elaborate as you want them to be, and it enables functionality that doesn't exist in the default Automator actions.

To run scripts in your workflow, simply add the 'Run JavaScript,' 'Run AppleScript,' or 'Run Shell scripts' actions into the mix. The options are nigh-on limitless, but here's an example that I use in my workflows:

That script will resize the Safari window automatically, and that comes in extremely handy when I'm testing out new website layouts.

Automate your life

Once you start creating workflows, it's easy to lose yourself while attempting to optimize every interaction. Much of the tedious work associated with your career and hobbies can be lifted off your shoulders with a little time spent with Automator, but you can just as easily waste hours trying to shave off a few minutes here and there. Take advantage of the power of automation, but remember that it's not a perfect fit for every situation.

If you're interested in finding out even more about Automator, check out Sal Soghoian's Automator.us. He's the man behind Automator, and he quite literally wrote the book on AppleScript.

What's the best version of the Mac OS for your Mac? It depends on the hardware.

DR writes:

I enjoyed reading How Can I Prepare for Mac OS X?, especially about the different Macs that you've owned. I got a Macintosh (yes, just plain Macintosh) in February 1985. Upgraded to a Mac 512K, a.k.a. Fat Mac. Upgraded to a 512Ke (with 128k ROM and a double-sided disk drive!). Got a Mac Classic 4/40. Got a Quadra 605 8/160. Got a used Quadra 630 8/250. Got a Power Computing PowerBase 180 32/1.2. Got a Power Computing PowerCenter Pro 240 64/2. And what a fun ride it has been. : )

While the 'How Can I Prepare for Mac OS X?' author is looking forward to Mac OS X, my feelings toward system software, as they called it in the old days, is a bit different. Whichever Mac I've owned has been a non-networked computer. A lot of times a newer version of a Mac OS would just run a little slower and take up more hard drive space. The question I like to answer which helps me decide whether to upgrade or not is, 'What do I want to do on my Mac that I could do with the new OS that I can't do with the old OS?' If I can't find anything, then I stick with what I've got. Reason's I've upgraded in the past have been: 1) newer OS required for certain applications 2) hope that the newer OS doesn't crash as often as the older one (shades of 7.6.1 and the PowerBase 180) and 3) to get HFS+.

There are two possible computers that I may upgrade. Please tell me what you think is the best version of Mac OS to run on each and why. First, my computer. I have a Power Computing PowerCenter Pro 240 with 64 MB RAM, 2 GB hard drive, CD-ROM, Zip drive, Personal LaserWriter 300, external speakers, 56k modem, mic, and a Color QuickCam. I'm running Mac OS 8.1 and thinking about upgrading to 8.5. 'What would I want to do on my Mac that I could do with 8.5 that I can't do with the 8.1?' Also the potential hard drive problem causes me to hesitate upgrading as well.

The second computer: my sister has inherited the Macs that I didn't sell. Currently, she has a Quadra 630 with 20 MB of RAM, 250 MB hard drive, inkjet printer, external CD-ROM, and a 33.6 kbps modem. She is currently using version 7.5.5. She's not a power user. She just uses the Internet a little and uses WriteNow a little. She's had some difficulty keeping her Internet connection. This could be related to the noisy phone lines in her rural area, but different system software may help her also. What version of Mac OS do you think is best for her?

During the day, I support a network of 70-some Macs. The oldest, sold about two years ago, was a 2.5 MB Mac Plus with 20 MB GCC HyperDrive. The newest are a Power Mac G3/266 and a PowerBook G3/233. And there are probably two dozen different models between those extremes.

To maintain my sanity, I have done my best to keep as many Macs as possible on the same version of the Mac OS. With few exceptions, that means System 7.5.5. (Or 7.5.3 for a few Macs that are not compatible with 7.5.5.) I find it complete and stable. At this point, I see no reason to ever change most users to Mac OS 8 or newer. None.

The only Macs I would hesitate to run 7.5.5 on are the old 8 MHz 68000-based ones. While they can run System 7.5.5, they feel a lot more responsive with System 6.0.8.

A couple machines need Mac OS 7.6, so that's what they get. Just a few of us are using Mac OS 8.1 – some because it came with the computers, three others so we can be familiar with it (and we're now testing 8.5.1). By choice, I don't use HFS+, a choice I made before Norton Utilities 4, which has problems with HFS+.

Nice as HFS+ would be, the extra 100 MB it frees on my hard drive hasn't been worth the struggles of getting it to work correctly. Twice I've invested over half-a-day in trying to make my system work with HFS+. Both times I've reverted to HFS. I'm sure I'll go HFS+ soon, but I need to have the free time to troubleshoot any problems that may arise. (See HFS+ Nightmares and Beyond HFS+ Nightmares for the full story.)

Unless you work with a lot of small files on a large drive, I don't see HFS+ as a compelling reason to upgrade. I'm happily using Mac OS 8.1 without it.

That said, I love the spring loaded folders, which really reduce desktop clutter. At home, I love the PPP stability – even better than FreePPP. Contextual menus are nice, but the main reason I switched at home was because I have 8.1 at work. It's much easier to work on the same version of the OS than to go back and forth.

I haven't run Mac OS 8.1 on a 68040-based Mac, but my son (who now uses my old Centris 610) did the upgrade and says it's very stable – and faster than 7.5.5 was. I've heard similar reports from others. The ability to jettison pre-68040 code allowed Apple to make 8.1 more streamlined than earlier versions that had to support the 68000 and 68020 (through 7.5.5) and 68030 (through 7.6.1).

Update: Apple claimed they jettisoned pre-68040 code, but we have evidence from Scott Barber and the Born Again program that 68030-based Macs can run Mac OS 8.0 and 8.1. This is sort of like the way Mac OS X is 'unsupported' on some Macs, yet XPostFacto allows it to install and run.

I've found Mac OS 8.1 stable enough and feature-laden enough to recommend it to anyone with a Quadra or Power Mac who is willing to spend $40 for the upgrade.

As for Mac OS 8.5, I must admit I'm a firm believer in Murphy's Law: If anything can go wrong, it will. At work, we were approved to buy three copies and test it. The rare hard drive problem, estimated to trouble less than 1% of all systems, would almost certainly choose one of those three, trash a 1.2 GB to 4 GB hard drive beyond repair, and cost one or two days of down time.

Sure, we do daily backup. But if the drive is so seriously damaged that it must be replaced, even an overnight shipment means a day without a usable computer. It's not a risk I'm prepared to take, especially since nobody seems to have pinned down the underlying cause of this problem. (Apple is collecting hard drives from the field.)

But Mac OS 8.5 was mostly a matter of when: After Apple discovered the cause of the problem and released a fix for it, we bought it and installed it on a few machines for testing purposes. I think it will be especially helpful in a networked environment (that includes using a modem to reach the Internet), since all the I/O drivers are now PowerPC native and Open Transport has been significantly upgraded.

So my vote is Mac OS 7.5.5 on pre-68040 models, 8.1 on 68040 and PowerPC machines, and either 8.1 or 8.5.1 on Power Macs and Mac clones.

Reader Feedback

Keep Your Sanity Mac Os 11

Chik writes:

I had no problems installing Mac OS 8.5 on a Power Mac 6200. No hard drive corruption, etc. It was a clean clean install.

But it is so much slower than OS 8.1 that I can't recommend anyone use it. I had to disable much of the OS to get it to speed up e.g. AppleScript, file sharing, etc.

Also have Speed Doubler 8.x.

Keep Your Sanity Mac Os Download

BV writes:

Regarding problems in reformatting to HFS+: I wasn't going to do it, because I didn't think it was worth backing up and initializing my hard drive to save the space.

Surfing through Macworld I found a mention of an application called Plus Maker from Alsoft ($19.95; www.alsoft.com). Children of the camp mac os. I downloaded it and near-instantaneously reformatted the hard drive on my PowerMac 6500/250 (OS 8.1) without initializing, without backing up (I'm a home user – what have I got to back up a 4 GB hard drive with?), without losing data or any (more) stability problems than I had before. I saved over 1 GB of space on my drive.

If this sounds like an ad, I could damn sure write them a genuine, uncompensated endorsement (schmuck that I am).

Thanks for what you're doing; I just bought Vimage's PF G3/240-225 upgrade card on your say-so, since I'm apparently running the same system you are.

We used Plus Maker on all of our Mac OS 8.1 systems at work to convert the drives to HFS+. It was a bit risky, but only because at that time neither Norton nor any other hard drive utility could work with HFS+ drives. Mine was the only drive to have problems, which may have been due to file corruption or third-party software. As of last week, I am successfully using HFS+ on my hard drive at work.

Keywords: #bestmacos #bestsystemversion

Keep Your Sanity Mac OS

Without a doubt, the most powerful aspect of Automator is the ability to run AppleScript, JavaScript, and shell scripts in the workflow. The scripts can be as elaborate as you want them to be, and it enables functionality that doesn't exist in the default Automator actions.

To run scripts in your workflow, simply add the 'Run JavaScript,' 'Run AppleScript,' or 'Run Shell scripts' actions into the mix. The options are nigh-on limitless, but here's an example that I use in my workflows:

That script will resize the Safari window automatically, and that comes in extremely handy when I'm testing out new website layouts.

Automate your life

Once you start creating workflows, it's easy to lose yourself while attempting to optimize every interaction. Much of the tedious work associated with your career and hobbies can be lifted off your shoulders with a little time spent with Automator, but you can just as easily waste hours trying to shave off a few minutes here and there. Take advantage of the power of automation, but remember that it's not a perfect fit for every situation.

If you're interested in finding out even more about Automator, check out Sal Soghoian's Automator.us. He's the man behind Automator, and he quite literally wrote the book on AppleScript.

What's the best version of the Mac OS for your Mac? It depends on the hardware.

DR writes:

I enjoyed reading How Can I Prepare for Mac OS X?, especially about the different Macs that you've owned. I got a Macintosh (yes, just plain Macintosh) in February 1985. Upgraded to a Mac 512K, a.k.a. Fat Mac. Upgraded to a 512Ke (with 128k ROM and a double-sided disk drive!). Got a Mac Classic 4/40. Got a Quadra 605 8/160. Got a used Quadra 630 8/250. Got a Power Computing PowerBase 180 32/1.2. Got a Power Computing PowerCenter Pro 240 64/2. And what a fun ride it has been. : )

While the 'How Can I Prepare for Mac OS X?' author is looking forward to Mac OS X, my feelings toward system software, as they called it in the old days, is a bit different. Whichever Mac I've owned has been a non-networked computer. A lot of times a newer version of a Mac OS would just run a little slower and take up more hard drive space. The question I like to answer which helps me decide whether to upgrade or not is, 'What do I want to do on my Mac that I could do with the new OS that I can't do with the old OS?' If I can't find anything, then I stick with what I've got. Reason's I've upgraded in the past have been: 1) newer OS required for certain applications 2) hope that the newer OS doesn't crash as often as the older one (shades of 7.6.1 and the PowerBase 180) and 3) to get HFS+.

There are two possible computers that I may upgrade. Please tell me what you think is the best version of Mac OS to run on each and why. First, my computer. I have a Power Computing PowerCenter Pro 240 with 64 MB RAM, 2 GB hard drive, CD-ROM, Zip drive, Personal LaserWriter 300, external speakers, 56k modem, mic, and a Color QuickCam. I'm running Mac OS 8.1 and thinking about upgrading to 8.5. 'What would I want to do on my Mac that I could do with 8.5 that I can't do with the 8.1?' Also the potential hard drive problem causes me to hesitate upgrading as well.

The second computer: my sister has inherited the Macs that I didn't sell. Currently, she has a Quadra 630 with 20 MB of RAM, 250 MB hard drive, inkjet printer, external CD-ROM, and a 33.6 kbps modem. She is currently using version 7.5.5. She's not a power user. She just uses the Internet a little and uses WriteNow a little. She's had some difficulty keeping her Internet connection. This could be related to the noisy phone lines in her rural area, but different system software may help her also. What version of Mac OS do you think is best for her?

During the day, I support a network of 70-some Macs. The oldest, sold about two years ago, was a 2.5 MB Mac Plus with 20 MB GCC HyperDrive. The newest are a Power Mac G3/266 and a PowerBook G3/233. And there are probably two dozen different models between those extremes.

To maintain my sanity, I have done my best to keep as many Macs as possible on the same version of the Mac OS. With few exceptions, that means System 7.5.5. (Or 7.5.3 for a few Macs that are not compatible with 7.5.5.) I find it complete and stable. At this point, I see no reason to ever change most users to Mac OS 8 or newer. None.

The only Macs I would hesitate to run 7.5.5 on are the old 8 MHz 68000-based ones. While they can run System 7.5.5, they feel a lot more responsive with System 6.0.8.

A couple machines need Mac OS 7.6, so that's what they get. Just a few of us are using Mac OS 8.1 – some because it came with the computers, three others so we can be familiar with it (and we're now testing 8.5.1). By choice, I don't use HFS+, a choice I made before Norton Utilities 4, which has problems with HFS+.

Nice as HFS+ would be, the extra 100 MB it frees on my hard drive hasn't been worth the struggles of getting it to work correctly. Twice I've invested over half-a-day in trying to make my system work with HFS+. Both times I've reverted to HFS. I'm sure I'll go HFS+ soon, but I need to have the free time to troubleshoot any problems that may arise. (See HFS+ Nightmares and Beyond HFS+ Nightmares for the full story.)

Unless you work with a lot of small files on a large drive, I don't see HFS+ as a compelling reason to upgrade. I'm happily using Mac OS 8.1 without it.

That said, I love the spring loaded folders, which really reduce desktop clutter. At home, I love the PPP stability – even better than FreePPP. Contextual menus are nice, but the main reason I switched at home was because I have 8.1 at work. It's much easier to work on the same version of the OS than to go back and forth.

I haven't run Mac OS 8.1 on a 68040-based Mac, but my son (who now uses my old Centris 610) did the upgrade and says it's very stable – and faster than 7.5.5 was. I've heard similar reports from others. The ability to jettison pre-68040 code allowed Apple to make 8.1 more streamlined than earlier versions that had to support the 68000 and 68020 (through 7.5.5) and 68030 (through 7.6.1).

Update: Apple claimed they jettisoned pre-68040 code, but we have evidence from Scott Barber and the Born Again program that 68030-based Macs can run Mac OS 8.0 and 8.1. This is sort of like the way Mac OS X is 'unsupported' on some Macs, yet XPostFacto allows it to install and run.

I've found Mac OS 8.1 stable enough and feature-laden enough to recommend it to anyone with a Quadra or Power Mac who is willing to spend $40 for the upgrade.

As for Mac OS 8.5, I must admit I'm a firm believer in Murphy's Law: If anything can go wrong, it will. At work, we were approved to buy three copies and test it. The rare hard drive problem, estimated to trouble less than 1% of all systems, would almost certainly choose one of those three, trash a 1.2 GB to 4 GB hard drive beyond repair, and cost one or two days of down time.

Sure, we do daily backup. But if the drive is so seriously damaged that it must be replaced, even an overnight shipment means a day without a usable computer. It's not a risk I'm prepared to take, especially since nobody seems to have pinned down the underlying cause of this problem. (Apple is collecting hard drives from the field.)

But Mac OS 8.5 was mostly a matter of when: After Apple discovered the cause of the problem and released a fix for it, we bought it and installed it on a few machines for testing purposes. I think it will be especially helpful in a networked environment (that includes using a modem to reach the Internet), since all the I/O drivers are now PowerPC native and Open Transport has been significantly upgraded.

So my vote is Mac OS 7.5.5 on pre-68040 models, 8.1 on 68040 and PowerPC machines, and either 8.1 or 8.5.1 on Power Macs and Mac clones.

Reader Feedback

Keep Your Sanity Mac Os 11

Chik writes:

I had no problems installing Mac OS 8.5 on a Power Mac 6200. No hard drive corruption, etc. It was a clean clean install.

But it is so much slower than OS 8.1 that I can't recommend anyone use it. I had to disable much of the OS to get it to speed up e.g. AppleScript, file sharing, etc.

Also have Speed Doubler 8.x.

Keep Your Sanity Mac Os Download

BV writes:

Regarding problems in reformatting to HFS+: I wasn't going to do it, because I didn't think it was worth backing up and initializing my hard drive to save the space.

Surfing through Macworld I found a mention of an application called Plus Maker from Alsoft ($19.95; www.alsoft.com). Children of the camp mac os. I downloaded it and near-instantaneously reformatted the hard drive on my PowerMac 6500/250 (OS 8.1) without initializing, without backing up (I'm a home user – what have I got to back up a 4 GB hard drive with?), without losing data or any (more) stability problems than I had before. I saved over 1 GB of space on my drive.

If this sounds like an ad, I could damn sure write them a genuine, uncompensated endorsement (schmuck that I am).

Thanks for what you're doing; I just bought Vimage's PF G3/240-225 upgrade card on your say-so, since I'm apparently running the same system you are.

We used Plus Maker on all of our Mac OS 8.1 systems at work to convert the drives to HFS+. It was a bit risky, but only because at that time neither Norton nor any other hard drive utility could work with HFS+ drives. Mine was the only drive to have problems, which may have been due to file corruption or third-party software. As of last week, I am successfully using HFS+ on my hard drive at work.

Keywords: #bestmacos #bestsystemversion

Short link: http://goo.gl/YsoosU

searchword: bestsystemversion





broken image